FIELD IMAGE SEGMENTATION IN PRECISION AGRICULTURE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54668/2789-6323-2025-120-5-79-90Keywords:
precision agriculture, segmentation, NDVI, drones, remote sensingAbstract
Precision farming methods require consideration of subtle differences in plant growth processes in different areas of cultivated arable land. Differences in the relief of the field, its water supply, the thickness of the humus layer, etc. cause the need to rank the arable land for the application of agrotechnical operations of different intensities, which ultimately leads to higher yields and lower costs of agricultural crops. The ranking of arable land within a field is usually accomplished by segmentation of remotely sensed data. The creation of a segmentation system requires periodic remote and ground monitoring of fields, collection and processing of the received information with its geographical reference. Both satellite remote sensing systems and unmanned aerial platforms (UAPs) can be used for this purpose. The volume of information received, especially when using UAVs, is very significant, and the requirements for the speed of processing are high. In this regard, efficient methods of systematization and processing of the received images, which rely on sufficiently fast segmentation algorithms, are relevant. This paper considers methods of image segmentation from various remote sensing systems, which allow to increase the economic performance of agronomic measures in the precision farming loop. An example of a threshold segmentation program is given, which can be used separately or as part of an information system to support precision farming processes. The paper presents the results of its application for segmentation of satellite images of a field by NDVI index value. The conducted analysis and recommendations on the segmentation data will contribute to the prevention of environmental violations, yield losses due to sudden changes in weather conditions and differences in the relief of cultivated arable land.
References
Rouse J. W., Haas R. H., Schell J. A., Deering D. W. (1973). Monitoring the vernal advancement and retrogradation (green wave effect) of natural vegetation. Texas A&M University, Remote Sensing Center.
MacQueen J. B. (1967). Some methods for classification and analysis of multivariate observations. In Proceedings of the Fifth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability. University of California Press. Vol. 1. Р. 281–297.
Vassilaros A. ISODATA. Presentation [Electronic resources] URL: https://web.pdx.edu/~jduh/courses/Archive/geog481w07/Students/Vassilaros_ISODATA.pdf (date of access: 15.12.2024)
Guastaferro F., Castrignanò A., De Benedetto D., Sollitto D., Troccoli A., & Cafarelli B. (2010). A comparison of different algorithms for the delineation of management zones. Precision Agriculture, 11(5), 600–620. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11119-010-9183-4
Johnson S. C. (1967). Hierarchical clustering schemes. Psychometrika, 32(3). P. 241–254.
Scikit-image. (n.d.). Segmentation — Image analysis in Python. [Electronic resources] URL: https://scikit-image.org/skimage-tutorials/lectures/4_segmentation.html (date of access: 15.12.2024)
Verbesselt J., Hyndman R. J., Newnham G., Culvenor D. (2010). Detecting trend and seasonal changes in satellite image time series. Remote Sensing of Environment, 114(1). P. 106–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2009.08.014
Miller L., Pelletier C., Webb G. I. (2024). Deep learning for satellite image time series analysis: A review. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2404.03936
Mukhamediev R. I., Terekhov A., Amirgaliyev Y., Popova Y., Malakhov D., Kuchin Y., Sagatdinova G., Symagulov A., Muhamedijeva E., Gricenko P. (2024). Using pseudo-color maps and machine learning methods to estimate long-term salinity of soils. Agronomy, 14, 2103. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14092103
Matheron G. (1963). Principles of geostatistics. Economic Geology, 58(8), 1246–1266.
Huete A., Didan K., Miura T., Rodriguez E. P., Gao X., Ferreira L. G. (2002). Overview of the radiometric and biophysical performance of the MODIS vegetation indices. Remote Sensing of Environment, 83(1–2), 195–213.
OneSoil Yield. (n.d.). Пример снимка NDVI. [Electronic resources] URL:https://app.yield.onesoil.ai/ (date of access: 20.08.2024)
Gitelson A. A., Kaufman Y. J., Merzlyak M. N. (1996). Use of a green channel in remote sensing of global vegetation from EOS-MODIS. Remote Sensing of Environment, 58(3), 289–298.
Lymburner L., Beggs P. J., Jacobson C. R. (2000). Estimation of canopy-average surface-specific leaf area using Landsat TM data. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 66(2), 183–191.
Copernicus Data Space Ecosystem, [Electronic resources] URL: https://dataspace.copernicus.eu/ (date of access: 20.08.2024)
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Кирилл Гаринских, Алпамыс Карыпов, Адилхан Сымагулов, Ян Кучин, Алексей Терехов, Равиль Мұхамедиев, Надия Юничева, Нурсултан Кульдеев, Рат Бердибаев

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.




